PANASONIC TX-29AD1D YEAR 1995.

PANASONIC  TX-29AD1D  A heavy 29 Inches (68Cm) color television was one of the flagship of PANASONIC in 1995.
It's part of the GAOO series which basically was a top picture quality model type.

Panasonic's flagship TV line is the GAOO ("King of Pictures") series, televisions they've aimed squarely at the Sony XBR series. And they're a darn fine crop of sets, too; we think they're the best Panasonic has ever offered.
GAOO's are offered in 27, 31, and 35 inch screen sizes;Picture quality is very subjective, but we'd have to rate the GAOO right up there with the best. Flesh tones, always a good measure of TV quality, were very nice, and they stayed rock solid through channel changes, thanks to Panasonic's "AI Picture" circuitry.
GAOO comes with Panasonic's Dome Sound System, thin dome speakers that wrap around the picture tube and fire their energy out toward the audience. You also get a new surround sound circuit that's supposed to offer an airy, "3D" effect, and it works pretty well. An automatic volume control maintains an even audio keel when channel flipping or when commercials begin their inevitable assault.
This is the first PANASONIC model featuring the Digial chassis with One chip DVP DSP.

The previous models were equipped with the EURO-1 Digital Chassis.

It has 100 Programs and 140 Channels / Advanced OSD /Stereo Sound / Teletext 500 Pages Mem.
and it's Full Multistandard.

This tellye is offering Very amazing pictures, with high focus, crisp, and contrast thanks even to an excellent driven PHILIPS ESF CRT TUBE.

Colors are stunning and all edges in the picture are every time precisely spotted.

Even the sound is super, nothing to compare with actual market crap !!



The television receiver has an alphanumeric display  which appears on the picture tube screen, to give the user data on the tuned channel number, colour settings and other operating data. The digital processor which generates the characters for display also controls the channel setting, etc., under the control of a digital remote control unit . The processor  has an associated memory circuit  for permanent tuning back up. The control of the capacitance diode tuner  is achieved by the processor  altering the dividing factor of a feedback loop to a phase/frequency comparator . The other input to the comparator is a divided frequency from a quartz oscillator.

With this model, Panasonic, is , like other high class fabricants, adopting the DIGIVISION MICRONAS / ITT Digital Signal Processing Technology, using the ITT DIGIVISION DIGIT3000 Fast one chipset improving furthermore picture quality and sound.

The PANASONIC  TX-29AD1D is The DIGITAL Colour television receiver or set , which is known in which the majority of signal processing that takes place therein is carried out digitally. That is, a video or television signal is received in a conventional fashion using a known analog tuning circuit and then, following the tuning operation, the received analog television signal is converted into a digital signal and digitally processed before subsequently being converted back to an analog signal for display on a colour cathode ray tube.
In a conventional television receiver, all signals are analog-processed. Analog signal processing, however, has the problems at the video stage and thereafter. These problems stem from the general drawbacks of analog signal processing with regard to time-base operation, specifically, incomplete Y/C separation (which causes cross color and dot interference), various types of problems resulting in low picture quality, and low precision of synchronization. Furthermore, from the viewpoints of cost and ease of manufacturing the analog circuit, a hybrid configuration must be employed even if the main circuit comprises an IC. In addition to these disadvantages, many adjustments must be performed.

In order to solve the above problems, it is proposed to process all signals in a digital form from the video stage to the chrominance signal demodulation stage. In such a digital television receiver, various improvements in picture quality should result due to the advantages of digital signal processing.
Therefore digital television signal processing system introduced in 1984 by the Worldwide Semiconductor Group (Freiburg, West Germany) of International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation is described in an ITT Corporation publication titled "VLSI Digital TV System--DIGIT 2000." In that system color video signals, after being processed in digital (binary) form, are converted to analog form by means of digital-to-analog converters before being coupled to an image displaying kinescope. The analog color video signals are coupled to the kinescope via analog buffer amplifiers and video output kinescope driver amplifiers which provide video output signals at a high level suitable for driving intensity control electrodes of the kinescope.

The entire video processing and controlling for a color TV has been developed on a single chip in 0.8µ CMOS
technology. Modular design and submicron technology allow the economic integration of features in all classes
of TV sets.
Open architecture is the key word to the new DSP generation. Flexible standard building blocks have been defined that offer continuity and transparency of the entire system.
One IC contains the entire video and deflection processing and builds the heart of a modern color TV. Its performance and complexity allow the user to standardize his product development. Hardware and software appli-
cations can profit from the modularity as well as manufacturing, system support or maintenance. The main
features are:

– low cost, high performance
– all digital video processing
– multi-standard color decoder PAL/NTSC/SECAM
– 3 composite, 1 S–VHS input
– integrated high-quality AD/DA converters
– sync and deflection processing
– luminance and chrominance features, e.g.
peaking, color transient improvement
– programmable RGB matrix
– various digital interfaces
– embedded RISC controller (80 MIPS)
– one crystal, few external components
– single power supply 5 V
– 0.8µ CMOS Technology
– 68-pin PLCC or 64-pin Shrink DIL Package

Present-day, so-called digital television receivers generally contain at least two A/D converters ("analog-to-digital converters"). One of the A/D converters serves to convert the video signal from analog to digital form and is commonly located after the so-called sound trap, which keeps the sound-carrier signal out of the remaining signal. This first A/D converter is operated with a sampling signal whose frequency is usually four times the chrominance subcarrier frequency. Typically, this first A/D converter is a flash converter.
The second A/D converter is located at the beginning of the audio channel and, unlike the first-mentioned A/D converter, is generally a delta-sigma converter.

 During the further development and refinement of the current principle of a digital television receiver, it has turned out that each of the various current television standards, and also expected future television standards, require suitably designed subcircuits which lead to a great number of different types of integrated circuits. This is disadvantageous, particularly with regard to the mass production of integrated circuits.
It is, therefore, the object of the invention as claimed to provide a circuit principle for television receiving sections having at least one interface between the analog signal processing circuitry and the digital signal-processing circuitry which permits considerably simpler adaptation to different television standards and reduces the number of A/D converters required.
The main idea underlying the invention is to use a single A/D converter already at the output of the intermediate-frequency stage (i.e., where the signal, still in its analog format, lies in a frequency range between about 30 MHz and 40 MHz). The clock signal of this A/D converter has a frequency approximately equal to twice the bandwidth of the received signal (e.g., a frequency of about 20 MHz). After this A/D converter, the received signal is divided into a video-information-processing channel ("the video channel"), and an audio-information processing channel ("the audio channel"). Compared to the conventional solution described above, the need for the separate audio-channel A/D converter is eliminated, so that in a currently marketable system, a complete integrated circuit is saved.

Furthermore it adds for first time a  digital sound processor for processing multistandard sound signals which are fed as analog or digital signals from at least one source to the sound processor at baseband or higher frequencies.
Such sound processors are suitable for processing sound signals of various transmission standards for entertainment electronics, such as sound signals of different television standards, satellite receivers, video recorders, radios with traffic information message decoders, etc., but also sound signals which are generated by means of specific personal computer sound cards. Via control inputs, the processing in the digital sound processor is adapted to the respective transmission standard or sound source, and via internal processors, the desired sound impression (treble, bass, volume, stereo effect, etc.) is adjusted.
One example of such a digital sound processor is the MSP 3410D Multistandard Sound Processor of Micronas Intermetall, a commercially available module used in entertainment electronics equipment. A detailed description of this flexible sound processor can be found, for example, in the relevant data sheet, Edition Jan. 15, 1998, Order No. 6251-422-3PD.

Panasonic Corporation (Panasonikku Kabushiki-gaisha) (TYO: 6752, NYSE: PC), formerly known as Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ( Matsushita Denki Sangyō Kabushiki-gaisha), is a Japanese multinational consumer electronics corporation headquartered in Kadoma, Osaka, Japan. Its main business is in electronics manufacturing and it produces products under a variety of names including Panasonic and Technics. Since its founding in 1918, it has grown to become the largest Japanese electronics producer. In addition to electronics, Panasonic offers non-electronic products and services such as home renovation services. Panasonic was ranked the 89th-largest company in the world in 2009 by the Forbes Global 2000 and is among the Worldwide Top 20 Semiconductor Sales Leaders !

History

Panasonic was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita first selling duplex lamp sockets. In 1927, it produced a bicycle lamp, the first product it marketed under the brand name National. It operated factories in Japan and other parts of Asia through the end of World War II, producing electrical components and appliances such as light fixtures, motors, and electric irons. After World War II, Panasonic regrouped and began to supply the post war boom in Japan with radios and appliances, as well as bicycles. Matsushita's brother-in-law, Toshio Iue founded Sanyo as a subcontractor for components after WWII. Sanyo grew to become a competitor to Panasonic. Name For 90 years since establishment, the name of the company was always topped with "松下" ("Matsushita"). The company's name before 1 October 2008 had been "Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.", used since 1935. In 1927, the company founder adopted a brand name "National" ( National) for a new lamp product, knowing "national" meant "of or relating to a people, a nation."[5] In 1955, the company labeled its export audio speakers and lamps "PanaSonic", which was the first time it used its "Panasonic" brand name. The company began to use a brand name "Technics" in 1965.[6] The use of multiple brands lasted for some decades.[6] In May 2003, the company put "Panasonic" as its global brand, and set its global brand slogan, "Panasonic ideas for life."[7] The company began to unify its brands to "Panasonic" and, by March 2004 replaced "National" for products and outdoor signboards, except for those in Japan[7]. On January 10, 2008, the company announced that it would change its name to "Panasonic Corporation" (effective on October 1, 2008) and phase out the brand "National" in Japan, replacing it with the global brand "Panasonic" (by March 2010). The name change was approved at a shareholders' meeting on June 26, 2008 after consultation with the Matsushita family. Panasonic owns RCTI, Global TV and MNC TV. Electronics In 1961, Konosuke Matsushita traveled to the United States and met with American dealers. Panasonic began producing television sets for the U.S. market under the Panasonic brand name, and expanded the use of the brand to Europe in 1979. The company used the National trademark outside of North America during the 1950s through the 1970s. (The trademark could not be used probably due to discriminatory application of trademark laws where brands like General Motors were registrable.) It sold televisions, hi-fidelity stereo receivers, multi-band shortwave radios, and marine radio direction finders, often exported to North America under various U.S. brand names. The company also developed a line of home appliances such as rice cookers for the Japanese and Asian markets. Rapid growth resulted in the company opening manufacturing plants around the world. National/Panasonic quickly developed a reputation for well-made, reliable products. The company debuted a hi-fidelity audio speaker in Japan in 1965 with the brand Technics. This line of high quality stereo components became worldwide favorites. The most famous product still made today is the SL-1200 record player, known for its high performance, precision, and durability. Throughout the 1970s and early 1980s, Panasonic continued to produce high-quality specialized electronics for niche markets such as shortwave radios, as well as developing a successful line of stereo receivers, CD players, and other components. Since 2004, Toyota has used Panasonic batteries for its Toyota Prius, an environmentally friendly car made in Japan. On January 19, 2006 Panasonic announced that, starting in February, it will stop producing analog televisions (then 30% of its total TV business) to concentrate on digital TVs. On November 3, 2008 Panasonic and Sanyo were in talks, resulting in the eventual acquisition of Sanyo. The merger was completed in December 2009, and resulted in a mega-corporation with revenues over ¥11.2 trillion (around $110 billion). As part of what will be Japan's biggest electronics company, the Sanyo brand and most of the employees will be retained as a subsidiary. In November 1999, the Japan Times reported that Panasonic planned to develop a "next generation first aid kit" called the Electronic Health Checker. At the time, the target market was said to be elderly people, especially those living in rural areas where medical help might not be immediately available, so it was planned that the kit would include support for telemedicine. The kits were then in the testing stage, with plans for eventual overseas distribution, to include the United States. In recent years the company has been involved with the development of high-density optical disc standards intended to eventually replace the DVD and the SD memory card. On July 29, 2010 Panasonic reached an agreement to acquire the remaining shares of Panasonic Electric Works and Sanyo shares for $9.4 billion. Panasonic and Universal Panasonic used to own Universal Studios, then known as the Music Corporation of America, since acquiring the company in 1990 but sold it to Seagram in 1995. Universal Studios is now a unit of NBC Universal.

One more comment about digital in 2000..............

Over the years we have learnt that one of the most important things in video/ TV technology is selecting the best system to use. We have also seen how difficult this can be. Prior to the start of the colour TV era in Europe there was an great to-do about the best system to adopt. The US NTSC system seemed an obvious choice to start with. It had been proved in use, and refine- ments had been devised. But alternative, better solutions were proposed - PAL and Secam. PAL proved to be a great success, in fact a good choice. 

The French Secam system seems to have worked just as well. Apart from the video tape battles of the Seventies, the next really big debate concerned digital TV. When it came to digital terrestrial TV (DTT), Europe and the USA again adopted different standards. 

One major difference is the modulation system used for transmission. Coded orthogonal frequency   division multiplexing (COFDM) was selected for the European DVB system, while in the USA a system called 8VSB was adopted. COFDM uses quadrature amplitude modulation of a number of orthogonal carriers that are spread across the channel bandwidth. Because of their number, each carrier has a relatively low bit rate. 

The main advantage of the system is its excellent behaviour under multipath reception conditions. 8VSB represents a rather older,  pre phase modulation technoogy: eight  state amplitude modulation of a single carrier, with a vestigial sideband. The decision on the US system was assigned to the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC), reporting to the FCC. The system it proposed was approved by the FCC on December 26th, 1996. The curious date might suggest that there had been a certain amount of politicking. In fact there had been an almighty row between the TV and computer industries about the video standard to adopt, the two fearing that one or other would gain an advantage as the technologies converged. It was 'resolved' by adopting a sort of   "open standard"  we are talking about resolution and scanning standards here - the idea apparently being that the technology would somehow sort itself out.

 There seems to have been rather less concern about the modulation standard. 8VSB was adopted because it was assumed to be able to provide a larger service area than the alternatives, including COFDM, for a given transmitter power. Well, the USA is a very large place! But the US TV industry, or at least some parts of it, is now having second thoughts. Once the FCC had made its decision, there was pressure to get on with digital TV. In early 1998 there were announce- ments about the start of transmissions and broadcasters assured the FCC that DTT would be available in the ten areas of greatest population concentration by May 1999. Rapid advances were expected, with an anticipated analogue TV switch -off in 2006. So far however things have not gone like that. At the end of 1999 some seventy DTI' transmitters were in operation, but Consumer Electronics Manufacturers Association estimates suggest that only some 50,000 sets and 5,000 STBs had been sold.

 There have been many reports of technical problems, in particular with reception in urban and hilly areas and the use of indoor aerials, also with video/audio sync and other matters. Poor reception with indoor aerials in urban conditions is of particular concern: that's how much of the population receives its TV. The UK was the first European country to start DTI', in late 1998 - at much the same time as in the USA. The contrast is striking. ONdigital had signed up well over 500,000 subscribers by the end of 1999, a much higher proportion of viewers than in the USA. Free STBs have played a part of course, but it's notable that DTT 's reception in the UK has been relatively hassle -free. In making this comparison it should also be remembered that the main aim of DTT technology differs in Europe and the USA. 

The main concern in Europe has been to provide additional channels. In the USA it has been to move to HDTV, in particular to provide a successor the NTSC system. There have been plenty of channels in the USA for many a year. For example the DirecTV satellite service started in mid 1994 and offers some 200 channels. Internationally, various countries have been comparing the US and European digital systems. They have overwhelmingly come down in favour of the DVB system. There have been some very damaging assessments of the ATSC standard. The present concern in the US TV industry results from this poor domestic take up and lack of international success. Did the FCC make a boob, in particular in the choice of 8VSB? Following compara- tive tests carried out by Sinclair Broadcasting Group Inc., the company has petitioned the FCC to adopt COFDM as an option in the ATSC standard. Not only did its tests confirm poor reception with indoor aerials: they also established that the greater coverage predicted for 8VSB failed to materialise in practice. Could the USA have two DTT transmission standards? It seems unlikely. It would involve dual standard receivers and non  standardisation of transmitters. In the all important business of system selection, it looks as if the FCC got it wrong.

              ....................................   It is obviously wasteful to duplicate terrestrial TV transmissions in analogue and digital form. Sooner or later transmissions will all be digital, since this is a more efficient use of spectrum space. The question is when? It would suit some to switch off the analogue transmitters as soon as possible. 2006 has been suggested as a time to start, with ana- logue transmissions finally ending in 2010. All very neat and tidy. Whether it will work out in that way is another matter. Strong doubts are already beginning to be aired. 

 The government has, quite properly, laid down conditions to be met before the switch off occurs. Basically that the digital signal coverage should equal that achieved for analogue TV, currently 99.4 per cent of the population, and that digital receiving equipment should be available at an affordable price. The real problem is that there is a difference between a coverage of 99.4 per cent and 99.4 per cent of the population actually having digital receiving equipment. Why should those who are interested in only free - to -air channels go out and buy/rent a digital receiver? It is already becoming evident that this represents a fair chunk of the population. 

The ITC has warned the government that the 2006-2010 timetable is in jeopardy. Peter Rogers, the ITC's chief executive, has said "we need to persuade people only interested in watching free -to -air television to switch to digital. "

Unless we do, there will be no switch - over." Well not quite, because the analogue receivers will eventually wear out and have to be replaced. But that could take a long, long time. Meanwhile many people will expect to be able to continue to watch their usual TV fare using their existing analogue receivers. 

Research carried out by Culture Secretary Chris Smith's department has established that between forty and fifty per cent of the population expects the BBC licence to cover their TV viewing, which means what they get at present in analogue form. A substantial percentage of the population simply isn't interested in going digital. In fact take up of integrated receiver -decoders, as opposed to the free digital set -top boxes, has so far been very slow. 

Of five million TV sets sold in the UK year 1999 , only 10,000 were digital. There are important factors apart from overall coverage and how many people have sets. There is the extension of coverage, which becomes more difficult to achieve eco- nomically as the number of those not covered decreases. There is the problem of reception quality. And there is the question of domestic arrangements and convenience. Extending coverage to the last ten fifteen per cent of the population by means of conventional terrestrial transmitters will be expensive. Mr Smith's department seems to have conceded that other methods of signal delivery may have to be adopted - by satellite, by microwave links or by cable. The latter has of course never been economic where few households are involved. 

The frequency planners have been trying to find ways of increasing coverage even to well populated areas. There are so many areas where problems of one sort or another make the provision of DTT difficult. Satellite TV is the obvious solution. 

The time may well come when it is wondered why anyone bothered with DTT. Signal quality is becoming an increasingly important factor as the digital roll out continues. In areas where the signal is marginal, viewers could experience the extreme irritation of picture break up or complete loss like even todays. This is quite apart from the actual quality of the channel, which depends on the number of bits per second used. There is a maximum number of bits per multiplex, the total being shared by several channels. The fewer the bits, the poorer the picture in terms of definition and rendering. 

There have already been complaints about poor quality. The question of domestic arrangements is one that has not so far received adequate public attention. Most households 2000 nowadays don't have just one TV set that the family watches. They have a main one, probably, almost certainly one or more VCRs, and several other sets around the house to serve various purposes. What 'the percentage of households that have digital TV' should really mean is the percentage willing to replace all this equipment. It will be expensive, and people would not be happy if they were told to throw away their other equipment when they get a single nice new all  singing all dancing widescreen digital TV set. It fact there would be uproar. The move from analogue to digital is not like that from 405 to 625 lines, which went fairly smoothly.

In those days few people had video equipment or a multitude of sets. The transition to digital is not going to be smooth, and the suggestion of a switch off during 2006-2010 already looks totally unrealistic. Unless the government subsidises or gives away digital TV sets - and why should it? - people will expect their existing equipment to continue to be usable.  

So it's likely that analogue TV will be with us for many years yet. But that would be the end of analogue too. 

.............................Indeed...............................

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

"Adslogans – A fast, efficient bespoke search service for advertisers on slogans, endlines, straplines, taglines etc. – Slogans of the 70s". Retrieved July 16, 2015.
"Corporate Profile Archived 27 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine." Panasonic Corporation. Retrieved February 15, 2011. "Head Office Location 1006, Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka 571-8501, Japan" (PDF Map Archived April 9, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, GIF Map Archived January 17, 2012, at the Wayback Machine (Direct link Archived December 18, 2010, at the Wayback Machine))

"Forbes Global 2000 Profile". Forbes. Retrieved January 3, 2010.

松下電器産業株式会社が「パナソニック株式会社」に社名変更, Panasonic Corporation. 1 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-03.(in Japanese).

"Matsushita Electric Becomes Panasonic Corporation". Panasonic Corporation. October 1, 2008. Retrieved October 3, 2008.

"Matsushita Electric to Change Name to Panasonic Corporation". Panasonic Corporation. October 1, 2008. Retrieved October 3, 2008.

"Shareholders of Matsushita approve company name change to Panasonic". International Herald Tribune. June 26, 2008. Retrieved October 3, 2008.

"Panasonic Corp (PCRFF:OTC US)". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on July 11, 2012. Retrieved March 14, 2012.

Segers, Rien (2016-01-29). Multinational Management: A Casebook on Asia’s Global Market Leaders. Springer. ISBN 9783319230122.

"Products on Display". Archived from the original on February 5, 2015. Retrieved July 16, 2015.

Eric Loveday, Green Car Reports. "Panasonic Approved For $4.6 Billion To Acquire Sanyo, To Become World's Largest Li-Ion Battery Maker." December 8, 2009. Retrieved March 10, 2017.

Panasonic expands use of Panasonic brand name globally in April 2003. /* Introduction */ Shahid Kapoor was the brand ambassador for Panasonic India from 2005 to 2010. Now Ranbir Kapoor has taken over along with Katrina Kaif Archived June 22, 2008, at the Wayback Machine

Suthakar, K. "The man behind Panasonic - Tech News | The Star Online". www.thestar.com.my. Retrieved 2019-01-04.

"Panasonic Senior Partner".

"It's a Wrap: MCA Sold : Matsushita to Pay About $6.6 Billion". Los Angeles Times. November 26, 1990. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Who Gets What From MCA Deal". The New York Times. December 1, 1990. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Seagram heads for Hollywood; Seagram will buy 80% of big studio from Matsushita". The New York Times. April 7, 1995. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Matsushita, Freed of MCA, Reports a Profit". The New York Times. August 28, 1996. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Panasonic donates $5-million to music city".

Perton, Marc (January 19, 2006). "Panasonic exiting analog TV business". Engadget. Retrieved July 1, 2009.

"Panasonic aims to take over Sanyo". BBC News. November 7, 2008. Retrieved December 16, 2012.

"Panasonic set to buy rival Sanyo". BBC News. December 19, 2008. Retrieved December 16, 2012.

"Panasonic officially owns Sanyo and boasts the world's largest plasma panel plant now". Tech Crunch. December 22, 2009.

"Reports: Panasonic to cut 40,000 jobs". The Jakarta Post. April 28, 2011. Archived from the original on July 25, 2012. Retrieved May 26, 2012.

"Panasonic to trim TV business, cut 1,000 jobs " Japan Today: Japan News and Discussion". Japan Today. October 20, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2012.

Junko Yoshida, EE Times. "3-D TV or Myspace TV?." January 10, 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2012.

Dylan Tweney (January 9, 2012). "Myspace reinvents itself as an "entertainment experience," with help from Panasonic and Justin Timberlake". VentureBeat. Retrieved February 23, 2012.

"Panasonic acquires 76% stake in Firepro-Systems". The Times of India. May 11, 2012. Retrieved May 26, 2012.

"Panasonic Falls to 37-Year Low on Wider Loss Target". November 5, 2012.

"Panasonic prepares for 'garage sale', to axe 10,000 jobs". Reuters. Retrieved November 14, 2012.

Maierbrugger, Arno (May 18, 2013). "Big names ready to enter Vietnam". Inside Investor. Retrieved June 30, 2013.

Marja Novak (July 5, 2013). "Panasonic to buy stake in Slovenia's Gorenje". Reuters.

"Panasonic Europe Announce New Operating Company to Expand New Cloud Video Surveillance Service at IFA 2013". Panasonic Business. Panasonic UK & Ireland. Archived from the original on July 14, 2014. Retrieved June 11, 2014.

"Panasonic, Tesla agree to partnership for US car battery plant". Nikkei Inc. July 29, 2014. Archived from the original on July 31, 2014. Retrieved August 1, 2014.

"Gigafactory battery plant planned by Tesla in tie-up with Panasonic". San Diego News.Net. Retrieved August 1, 2014.

Panasonic says initial investment in Tesla battery factory will be 'tens of billions' of yen. Reuters, October 6, 2014

By Anothony Ha, TechCrunch. "Panasonic Partners With Photon To Build Smarter Signs In Stores." November 16, 2014. November 17, 2014.

Ritsuko Ando and Lisa Twaronite, Reuters. "Panasonic withdraws from TV production in China: source." January 31, 2015. February 10, 2015.

By Takashi Mochizuki, The Wall Street Journal. "Panasonic to Buy Houston-Based ITC Global." March 16, 2015. April 6, 2015.

BizCommunity.com. "Panasonic...big plans for Africa and SA." April 21, 2015. April 21, 2015.

Giles Parkinson, Renew Economy. "Panasonic signs battery storage deal with 3 Australian utilities." June 2, 2015. June 3, 2015.

Energy Global. "Panasonic to produce catalyst-coated diesel particulate filter." November 16, 2015. November 17, 2015.

"Panasonic Indoor Vegetable Farm Offers More Opportunities for Farm-To-Table Experience". Panasonic. Retrieved January 27, 2016.

Meghan Ottolini, CRN. “Panasonic Partners to Make Denver The Smartest City in America." February 18, 2016. February 18, 2016.

"Nissan's battery pullout may energize rivals" Nikkei, August 6, 2016.

Zacks Equity Research, Zacks. "Tesla Says Panasonic Exclusive Supplier of Model 3 Batteries." June 9, 2016. June 9, 2016.

Ramsey, Mike (January 7, 2016), "Panasonic Will Bet Big on Gigafactory", The Wall Street Journal

Golson, Jordan (July 28, 2016). "Tesla's entire future depends on the Gigafactory". The Verge. Retrieved August 8, 2016.

"Panasonic to raise $3.9 billion, partly to finance Tesla plant investment".

"Panasonic releases transparent tv". Retrieved October 8, 2016.

"Panasonic to move Europe HQ out of UK". BBC News. August 30, 2018. Retrieved 30 August 2018.

Staff, Our Foreign (August 30, 2018). "Panasonic to move European HQ in London to Netherlands over Brexit concerns". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 30 August 2018.

"Panasonic Develops Two Models of Its First Full-Frame Mirrorless Camera". www.businesswire.com. 2018-09-25. Retrieved 2018-12-28.

News, Marc Chacksfield 2018-09-27T07:57:26Z. "Panasonic Lumix S1R and Lumix S full-frame mirrorless cameras revealed". digitalcameraworld. Retrieved 2018-12-28.

"Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2012" (PDF). Panasonic. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 22, 2013. Retrieved April 27, 2013.

Mobile World Live. "Panasonic looks to AI acquisitions with $10M fund." July 6, 2016. July 8, 2016.

"Panasonic to jump-start US battery cell output for Tesla". Nikkei Asian Review. June 21, 2016. Archived from the original on July 10, 2016. Retrieved 23 October 2016.

"Panasonic Avionics".

"Panasonic says its avionics business being probed by U.S. authorities". Reuters. February 2, 2017. Retrieved February 2, 2017.

"Panasonic to launch waterproof Eluga phone". The Telegraph. February 21, 2012. Retrieved April 20, 2013.

"Panasonic to stop making new smartphones for NTT Docomo: Kyodo". August 5, 2013.

"Panasonic overview".

"Company Overview of Panasonic Europe Ltd". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Company Overview of Panasonic Marketing Europe Gmbh". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Panasonic to move Europe HQ out of UK". BBC News. August 30, 2018. Retrieved 2 September 2018.

"Panasonic executive says Europe consumer sales hold up". Reuters. April 9, 2013. Retrieved April 20, 2013.

"Panasonic". Panasonic Electric Works. Archived from the original on December 14, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2012.

By Liam Stoker, Solar Power Portal. "Panasonic launches virtual solar service to UK consumers." May 14, 2015. May 14, 2015.

"Corporate Profile". panasonic.com/in/.

"It's a Wrap: MCA Sold: Matsushita to Pay About $6.6 Billion". The Los Angeles Times. 26 November 1990. Retrieved 14 April 2013.

"Who Gets What From MCA Deal". The New York Times. 1 December 1990. Retrieved 14 April 2013.

"Seagram heads for Hollywood; Seagram will buy 80% of big studio from Matsushita". The New York Times. 7 April 1995. Retrieved 14 April 2013.

"Matsushita, Freed of MCA, Reports a Profit". The New York Times. 28 August 1996. Retrieved 14 April 2013.

BATES, JAMES (April 7, 1995). "Matsushita to Sell 80% of MCA to Seagram Co. : Business: Distiller to pay about $7.1 billion. Japanese owner and Hollywood giant clashed often over five years". Los Angeles Times. ISSN 0458-3035. Retrieved 27 February 2018.

Reckard, E. Scott (December 9, 1996). "MCA changes name to Universal Studios Inc". Orlando Business Journal.

"Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2013" (PDF). Panasonic Corporation. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 23, 2014. Retrieved February 9, 2014.

Sanyo name to cease by April 1, 2012, Panasonic tells partners | AV Interactive | Pro AV news, analysis and comment from Europe's leading Audio Visual title | AV Magazine. AV Interactive (June 6, 2013). Retrieved 26 July 2013.

"Panasonic History: 1927 – Square bicycle lamp developed and marketed". Panasonic Corporation. Archived from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved October 2, 2008.

"Brand History". Panasonic Corporation. Archived from the original on November 8, 2008. Retrieved October 2, 2008.

"社史：2003年（平成15年） グローバルブランドを「Panasonic」に統一" (in Japanese). Panasonic Corporation. Retrieved October 2, 2008.

"Panasonic Establishes "A Better Life, A Better World" as its New Brand Slogan". Panasonic Corporation. Retrieved November 27, 2013.

PSIDS (China (Guangdong), Hong Kong, Macau) Archived May 17, 2012, at the Wayback Machine

"PSIDS(中国(广东),香港,澳门)". Archived from the original on September 27, 2014. Retrieved December 30, 2016.

audioXpress Staff, audioXpress. "Panasonic Confirms the Return of Technics Brand Archived 10 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine." September 6, 2014. Retrieved January 9, 2017.

"Panasonic snaps up Marco Reus as brand ambassador".

"Panasonic Sponsored Gamba Osaka Football Club Secures Domestic Treble! | Panasonic Newsroom Global". Panasonic Newsroom Global. Retrieved 5 February 2018.

"Panasonic renews with MLS, adds U.S. national teams". Sports Business Daily. October 10, 2011. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"AIFF signs Rs 4.7 crore deal with new sponsor". The Times of India. January 16, 2010. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

"Toyota goes virtual to show 2009 F1 car". USA Today. January 15, 2009. Retrieved April 27, 2013.

"2005 Sam's Town 300". Racing-Reference. Retrieved June 17, 2014.

"2005 SBC 250". Racing-Reference. Retrieved June 17, 2014.

"2005 Winn-Dixie 250 Presented by PepsiCo". Racing-Reference. Retrieved June 17, 2014.

"2005 Domino's Pizza 250". Racing-Reference. Retrieved June 17, 2014.

Bruce, Kenny (June 17, 2014). "JEFF GORDON ADDS NEW PRIMARY SPONSOR". NASCAR. Retrieved June 17, 2014.

"Olympic Affiliates Also Go for Gold". The New York Times. December 15, 1987. Retrieved April 14, 2013.

/careers.panasonic.aero

"Jaguar names Panasonic as title sponsor of its Formula E team". September 8, 2016. Retrieved September 8, 2016.

"Basket: Panasonic main sponsor Serie A" [Basketball: Panasonic main sponsor of Serie A] (in Italian). February 14, 2017. Archived from the original on February 16, 2017. Retrieved February 15, 2017.

"Guide to Greener Electronics". Greenpeace International. Retrieved November 16, 2011.

"Will Panasonic's 'hazard pay' make a difference to air pollution in China?". The Guardian. Retrieved July 16, 2015.